Oten Access

DEPLOYMENT OPTIONS

Choose where policy runs, where traffic flows, and who owns recovery.

The deployment model changes service ownership, key custody, data handling, availability engineering, and incident responsibility. Oten Access keeps those boundaries explicit before rollout begins.

System role: Customer platform team + Oten deployment owner

Evaluation depends on: Requires a responsibility matrix, data-flow review, failure-domain design, backup and restore plan, and verified component scope.

The Access Control Plane makes policy decisions; Oten Endpoint and Oten Gateway enforce at opposite sides; Signal coordinates paths and Relay only forwards encrypted fallback traffic.

Three deployment decisions shape the operating model.

Managed Control Plane

Oten operates the control services. The customer owns endpoint rollout, resource onboarding, Gateway placement, identity integration, policy configuration, and the responsibilities defined in the service agreement.

Self-hosted Control Plane

The customer owns control-service availability, state, signing and encryption keys, observability, capacity, backup, upgrades, disaster recovery, and incident response.

Distributed Gateway Data Plane

Gateway Data Plane Groups run near protected resources. Versioned profiles define rollout scope, while explicit Failover Sets define compatible runtime takeover.

Shared responsibility is defined by system concern.

Identity and policy

Define the identity source, assurance requirements, role ownership, policy approvals, separation of duties, and emergency access governance.

State and keys

Assign custody, rotation, backup, recovery, and compromise response for signing keys, encryption keys, device credentials, service credentials, and durable state.

Endpoint and Gateway

Own supported versions, staged rollout, health monitoring, rollback, platform prerequisites, certificates, resource routes, and local failure behavior.

Signal and Relay

Plan regional reachability, authentication, capacity, network policy, metadata handling, and failure behavior without treating Relay as the resource enforcement point.

Audit and privacy

Define collected fields, purpose, access control, export, residency, retention, legal basis, deletion, and incident handling.

Support and recovery

Name alert owners, escalation paths, maintenance windows, recovery objectives, compatibility windows, and the evidence required to return to service.

Control availability and application-path availability fail independently.

  • A Control Plane outage can preserve only signed, bounded last-known-good authority within its lease.
  • Signal loss affects coordination and path establishment, not existing application payload by definition.
  • Relay loss removes the encrypted fallback path; it does not change Gateway into a relay.
  • Gateway takeover occurs only among compatible members of an explicit Failover Set.
  • A failed rollout remains distinct from an active configuration and must have a tested rollback path.
  • Expired trust, policy, or authority converges toward the configured restrictive state for the affected resource.

A deployment evaluation should leave a reproducible evidence pack.

  • Component inventory, exact versions, operating systems, protocols, and resource modes.
  • Data-flow and trust-boundary diagram with ownership for every credential and key.
  • Backup, restore, upgrade, rollback, and incompatible-version tests.
  • Gateway rollout, explicit failover, partial-failure, and last-known-good expiry results.
  • Signal and Relay reachability, capacity assumptions, and direct-path fallback observations.
  • Audit export, retention, access-control, privacy, and incident-communication verification.

Turn deployment choice into an owned operating model.

Define the exact responsibility, failure, data, and recovery boundaries before selecting a rollout sequence.